Instructions
Subject: website accessibility assessment
Introduction
| Name of the cultural institution where the audit was conducted: | |
| Tool audited: | |
| Duration of the audit: | |
| Number of persons conducting the audit: | |
| Profile of persons conducting the audit: |
Questionnaire for testers
1. Was it easy to navigate the site or did you get lost in the number of sub-pages?
……………………………………………………………………………………..
2. Were the colours, font and content layout clear and visible?
……………………………………………………………………………………..
3. Were the page load time and responsiveness fast enough on various devices?
……………………………………………………………………………………..
4. How would you rate the user interface?
a. intuitive
b. requiring some effort
……………………………………………………………………………………..
5. How do you rate from 1 (the lowest) to 5 (the highest) the quality of the content and messages on the website? Are they in line with the institution’s profile? (Yes/No)Do they fit in with your interests? (Yes/No)
……………………………………………………………………………………..
6. How do you rate from 1 (the lowest) to 5 (the highest) the presentation of content and messages on the website? Are they in line with the institution’s profile? (Yes/No) Do they fit in with your expectations? (Yes/No)
……………………………………………………………………………………..
7. How do you rate the accessibility of the website in terms of native and foreign languages? From 1 (the lowest) to 5 (the highest)
……………………………………………………………………………………..
8. How do you rate the accessibility of the website for people with special needs?
| People with hearing impairments | 1. 2. 3. |
| People with hearing impairments | 1. 2. 3. |
| People with mobility impairments | 1. 2. 3. |
| People with cognitive disorders | 1. 2. 3. |
| Senior population | 1. 2. 3. |
| Children and Youth | 1. 2. 3. |
| Cultural minorities | 1. 2. 3. |
| People with less access to culture due to socio-geographic factors | 1. 2. 3. |
Tester recommendations for improving the website
- In terms of improving the interface:
1.
2.
3.
- In terms of the topics covered by the website:
1.
2.
3.
- In terms of ways to present content (e.g., video, interactive games, e-learning modules, virtual tours, interviews with experts):
1.
2.
3.
- Regarding ways to communicate with the user through the website:
1.
2.
3.
- In terms of readability and clarity of the website:
1.
2.
3.
- In terms of inclusiveness of the website and people with special needs:
1.
2.
3.