Final checklist for inclusive off-site digital mediation: a comprehensive checklist for verifying inclusivity and accessibility compliance

Is digital mediation possible on different devices (computers, tablets, smartphones) and adapted to different operating systems (Windows, macOS, Android, iOS)?

For the platform, does it support assistive technologies such as screen readers, text magnification, contrast change options or alternative communication methods (e.g., sign language translation)? 

Does the website automatically adapt to different screen resolutions, providing users with an optimal experience on any device?

Are messages and materials written in language that is simple, understandable, and respectful of the diversity of participants (e.g., taking into account people with limited language proficiency, different age or cultural groups)? 

Are materials, instructions and information available in a variety of languages, allowing people who do not speak the dominant language to participate?

Is it possible to use different methods of communication (e.g., text, audio, video) so that participants can choose the form that is most appropriate for them?

Is accessibility for people with different types of disabilities (e.g., subtitles, transcriptions, sign language translation, ability to adjust volume or contrast) taken into account in the digital tools?

Is navigation through the tools simple and intuitive? 

Are data protection regulations followed and do users feel secure about the privacy of their data?

Are appropriate communication security measures in place (encryption, passwords for access, identity verification)? 

Do participants have easy access to technical support in case of problems? 

Does the institution offer participants educational resources or instructions on how to use digital tools? 

Does the cultural institution conduct regular accessibility surveys to identify areas for improvement? 

Are participants given the opportunity to share their opinions on accessibility and inclusivity?

Does the platform meet WCAG requirements to ensure accessibility for people with various disabilities? 

Does the digital mediation comply with current laws on accessibility in the digital space?